skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99573 Find in a Library
Title: Assumption of the Efficacy of Middle-Range Explanation Typologies (From Theoretical Methods in Criminology, P 151-174, 1985, Robert F Meier, ed. - See NCJ-99570)
Author(s): D C Gibbons
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: Sage Publications, Inc
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Sale Source: Sage Publications, Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter explains the typological approach in criminology, reviews the history of its use, presents criteria for evaluating typologies, and assesses the effectiveness of typologies by analyzing three contemporary typological systems.
Abstract: The core assumption of the typological approach is that there are a number of distinct types or groups of offenses and offenders that can by identified and studied. This view has prevailed in various degrees of sophistication throughout the history of criminology. The rationale for the development of typological schemes in criminology is to facilitate etiological analysis of criminal behavior and the development of rehabilitative approaches appropriate for various offender types. For a typological system to be valid, it must be clear and explicit so that actual offenders can be assigned to categories. Typologies should also consist of mutually exclusive types so that actual offenders or crime events fall into only one of the categories. Also, the number of types should be relatively small so as not to be too unwieldy. Finally, the types must be empirically congruent with actual offenders or offenses. An assessment of three comprehensive typologies (Clinard and Quinney, Glaser, and Gibbons), including one developed by the author (Gibbons), indicates that the degree of patterning of offense behavior and other dimensions assumed in these typologies is much greater than what exists in the real world of criminal behavior. The behavioral diversity of offenders apparently defies systematic classification. Forty-five references are listed.
Index Term(s): Crime typologies; Criminology; Offender classification; Offense classification; Research design
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99573

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.