skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99574 Find in a Library
Title: Neoclassical Theory of Crime Control (From Theoretical Methods in Criminology, P 177-196, 1985, Robert F Meier, ed. - See NCJ-99570)
Author(s): E van denHaag
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 20
Sponsoring Agency: Sage Publications, Inc
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Sale Source: Sage Publications, Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter reviews rationales to justify punishment and then focuses on deterrence rationales and other issues pertinent to deterrence arguments: utilitarianism, the probability of punishment, perceptions of punishment threats, deterrability, and the morality of deterrence.
Abstract: After comparing the retributive and deterrence justifications for punishment, the chapter demonstrates the irrelevance of rehabilitation and incapacitation goals to the crime rate. A review of the historical roots of deterrence theory then focuses on its foundation in utilitarianism, primarily that propounded by Bentham. A critique of Benthamian views suggests flaws in the utilitarian postulate that happiness is humankind's primary goal and that people rationally control their behavior according to what will make them happy. The chapter then develops a deterrence theory, independent of the tenets of utilitarianism, which focuses on actions based on subjective perceptions. The discussion notes that deterrence does not depend upon a general pattern of cost-benefit calculation in human behavior, but rather upon the observation that most people repond to incentives and disincentives 'as though' calculating. Also considered are the role of the probability of punishment in deterrence, the time span between crime and punishment, perception of punishment threats, the role of deterrence in the formation of criminal and law-bidding habits, and moral issues in implementing deterrence theory. Twenty-three notes and four references are provided.
Index Term(s): Crime control theory; Deterrence; Punishment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99574

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.