skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 99604 Find in a Library
Title: Protesters on Trial - Criminal Justice in the Southern Civil Rights and Vietnam Antiwar Movements
Author(s): S E Barkan
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 207
Sponsoring Agency: Rutgers University Press
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8099
Sale Source: Rutgers University Press
100 Joyce Kilmer Avenue
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8099
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This book compares the political trials during the Southern civil rights and the Vietnam antiwar movements and analyzes the use of such trials as a method for impeding or promoting social and political change.
Abstract: In the civil rights movement, the criminal justice system was used by officials to harass activists. Arrests and prosecutions intimidated Southern blacks and their allies and forced the movement to spend large amounts of time, money, and energy defending its members against criminal charges. Because little chance of acquittals existed at the trial level due to regional hostility, defense lawyers concentrated on building a proper record for appeals to the Federal courts. As a result, trials were perfunctory proceedings in which the crucial issue of racism rarely surfaced. In the antiwar movement, the courts offered less hostility and greater opportunities for mobilization. Judges were more likely to permit political and moral arguments, and defendants, often acting as their own attorneys, transformed many trials into forums for their antiwar views. In addition, juries were much more willing to acquit. This book presents an analysis testing pluralist and Marxist approaches to the study of law and protest. It is argued that the legal experience of the civil rights movement supports an instrumentalist version of the Marxist approach to the study of law and protest, while the antiwar movement supports a class struggle version of Marxist theory. Footnotes, an index, and approximately 372 references are provided. (Publisher abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Civil disobedience; Comparative analysis; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Court procedures; Demonstrator arrests; Racial discrimination; Social conditions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.