skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99715 Find in a Library
Title: Considerations in the Use of Race Data
Corporate Author: Hawaii Dept of the Attorney General
United States of America
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 26
Sponsoring Agency: Hawaii Dept of the Attorney General
Honolulu, HI 96813
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Survey (Cross-Cultural)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined several methods by which an individual's race is coded in official statistics and considered the information gathered on adults arrested on 8 days in 1984 in Honolulu, Hawaii, to determine how the coding methods affected the reported data.
Abstract: The U.S. Bureau of the Census, the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program of the Hawaii State Department of Health, the State's Health Surveillance Program, and police agencies use slightly different methods of recording race, although the information is based mainly on self-reports from the citizens involved. Data from the 522 persons arrested on the 8 randomly selected days showed that slightly different numbers and percentages appeared in each racial category, depending on the coding method used. Data that are to be used in comparisons should be collected in a uniform manner. The public often concludes that the racial groups that predominate in the crime statistics are those most likely to commit crime, although these statistics show only the groups that are arrested most frequently. Criminal justice researchers need to clarify this distinction to the public. An appendix presents figures and tables.
Index Term(s): Community service officers; Cross-cultural analyses; Data collections; Ethnic groups; Hawaii; Statistical Analysis Centers
Note: Research and Statistics Report (CF02)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99715

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.