skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99741 Find in a Library
Title: Mediation and Arbitration as a Civil Alternative to the Criminal Justice System - An Overview and Legal Analysis (From Confidentiality in Mediation, P 1-11, Lawrence Freedman, et al, eds. - See NCJ-99740)
Author(s): P R Rice
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: American Bar Assoc
Chicago, IL 60611
Sale Source: American Bar Assoc
Order Fulfillment 513
750 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper considers two issues regarding confidentiality of mediation sessions: the subsequent use in litigation of information generated in the negotiation sessions and the degree to which mediation records are open to public inspection.
Abstract: The evidentiary rule giving limited privileged status to offers of compromise has some use in protecting the confidentiality of mediation sessions, since mediation is an attempt to reach a compromise without litigation. This rule has little practical value in protecting mediation confidentiality in jurisdictions where only the offer to settle is inadmissible. In such jurisdictions, all statements of fact made in mediation negotiations are admissible. Even broader application of this rule protects only incriminating statements regarding the conduct in question. Other mediation statements are admissible. The right of public access to mediation records is subject to a balancing test which determines whether disclosure would cause a harm greater than the benefit of revelation. This is a judgmental decision that often turns on the particular facts of a case, with outcomes varying from case to case and judge to judge. Complete protection for mediation sessions and records can be assured only through legislation that absolutely forbids the disclosure and use of mediation information outside the settlement process. A total of 295 footnotes are provided.
Index Term(s): Confidential records access; Mediation; Privileged communications; Rules of evidence
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99741

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.