skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99743 Find in a Library
Title: Confidentiality - A Closer Look (From Confidentiality in Mediation, P 47-77, Lawrence Freedman, et al, eds. - See NCJ-99740)
Author(s): L Freedman
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 31
Sponsoring Agency: American Bar Assoc
Chicago, IL 60611
Sale Source: American Bar Assoc
Order Fulfillment 513
750 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper identifies the legal parameters of the confidentiality issue in mediation, notes the importance of confidentiality for effective mediation, and recommends policies for ensuring such confidentiality.
Abstract: Confidentiality pertains to the exclusion of information volunteered in mediation sessions from use as evidence in any subsequent legal proceeding. The Florida case of Charles v. Charles (1980) and the Iowa case of Nehrig v. Smith (1951) show courts' intention to encourage mediation by protecting the confidentiality of information derived therefrom. Legislative and judicial decisions regarding mediation confidentiality will largely depend on a balancing test traditionally applied to the claim of privilege. Privilege is granted when the injury caused by the disclosure of communications would exceed the benefit to be derived from the revelation. The strongest argument for the injury of disclosure is the undermining of the public good derived from alternative dispute processing. Some efforts to ensure confidentiality in mediation include agreements between the disputants to abide by the confidentiality principle as well as agreements between mediation programs and local prosecutors that mediation records and other mediation information will not be sought as evidence. Legislation is the best means by protecting confidentiality, since it can eliminate the need to decide the issue in each case. Examples of relevant State laws are discussed. Eighty-six footnotes and a 43-item bibliography are provided. The appendix contains a selected annotation of Federal Rule 26 (on discovery) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Index Term(s): Judicial decisions; Mediation; Privileged communications; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99743

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.