skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 99746 Find in a Library
Title: Perspectives for Understanding Negotiation - Viewing Negotiation as a Judgmental Process
Journal: Journal of Conflict Resolution  Volume:29  Issue:1  Dated:(March 1985)  Pages:33-55
Author(s): M A Neale; M H Bazerman
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 23
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines economic, structural, personality, and behavioral systems models of negotiation behavior and proposes a fifth decisionmaking model as an aid to understanding failures in negotiation.
Abstract: Economic models assume that negotiators are rational utility maximizers, while structural models assume that third-party impasse procedures and constituency pressures explain negotiator behiavor. Personality approaches have focused on how such variables as cognitive complexity, risk-taking behavior, and risk perception of the negotiator affect the bargaining process. Finally, behavioral systems approaches consider the effects of economic, structural, and personality variables. It is suggested that viewing negotiation as a decisionmaking process can supplement and expand the understanding of failures to reach agreement provided by the other four perspectives. This approach identifies several judgmental deficiencies, biases, or cognitive limitations that may contribute to the negotiator's success and willingness to compromise. These include how the interaction is framed (gains vs. losses), the relative salience of associated costs, and overconfidence in one's own judgmental accuracy. From this perspective, the negotiation process may be significantly affected by cognitive shortcuts which negotiators' use to reduce the amount of information processed. To the extent that negotiation is a continuous process with clear and unambiguous feedback, the effect of these decisional biases will be reduced with experience. Included are 79 references.
Index Term(s): Behavior patterns; Decisionmaking; Negotiation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=99746

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.