skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 150732 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Final Report on the Validation and Effectiveness Study of Legal Representation Through Guardian Ad Litem
Corporate Author: US Dept of Health and Human Services
Office of Child Abuse and Neglect
Admin for Children and Families
United State
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 606
Sponsoring Agency: Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information
Washington, DC 20013
US Dept of Health and Human Services
Washington, DC 20447
Sale Source: Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information
P.O. Box 1182
Washington, DC 20013
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: These findings from a validation and effectiveness study of legal representation through guardian ad litem (GAL) are based on a randomly selected 23-county sample from interviews with GAL's, caseworkers, and judges, as well as case-record extractions.
Abstract: GAL's were randomly selected from lists in each of the 23 counties and asked to report on two child abuse or neglect cases. In attempting to determine the effectiveness of GAL's, an important issue was the definition of effectiveness. The study adopted a criterion-referenced or procedural definition of effectiveness, as opposed to one that would examine outcome. Effectiveness was defined as "the degree to which the GAL performed the five roles identified as essential to GAL work and the related tasks and activities." The five roles considered are factfinder and investigator, legal representative, mediator and negotiator, case monitor, and resource broker. Findings on GAL backgrounds encompassed recruitment, previous experience, specialized training, experience as a GAL, timeliness of appointment, caseload and hours worked, compensation, supervision and evaluation, and case placement goals. The findings show that no GAL model studied was consistently superior to the others across all five GAL roles. The findings suggest that an optimal approach may involve having a GAL who either has or has access to the expertise and resources of attorneys, lay volunteers, and caseworkers to perform the broad range of functions and services contained in the definition of the child advocate. Appended report on Phase I of the study and data-collection instruments
Main Term(s): Child victims
Index Term(s): Child abuse and neglect hearings; Corrections; Court procedures; Guardian ad litem; Rights of minors
Note: Presented in three parts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.