skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

JUSTINFO

Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 150732     Find in a Library
Title: Final Report on the Validation and Effectiveness Study of Legal Representation Through Guardian Ad Litem
Corporate Author: US Dept of Health and Human Services
Office of Child Abuse and Neglect
Admin for Children and Families
United States of America
Date Published: Unknown
Page Count: 606
  Annotation: These findings from a validation and effectiveness study of legal representation through guardian ad litem (GAL) are based on a randomly selected 23-county sample from interviews with GAL's, caseworkers, and judges, as well as case-record extractions.
Abstract: GAL's were randomly selected from lists in each of the 23 counties and asked to report on two child abuse or neglect cases. In attempting to determine the effectiveness of GAL's, an important issue was the definition of effectiveness. The study adopted a criterion-referenced or procedural definition of effectiveness, as opposed to one that would examine outcome. Effectiveness was defined as "the degree to which the GAL performed the five roles identified as essential to GAL work and the related tasks and activities." The five roles considered are factfinder and investigator, legal representative, mediator and negotiator, case monitor, and resource broker. Findings on GAL backgrounds encompassed recruitment, previous experience, specialized training, experience as a GAL, timeliness of appointment, caseload and hours worked, compensation, supervision and evaluation, and case placement goals. The findings show that no GAL model studied was consistently superior to the others across all five GAL roles. The findings suggest that an optimal approach may involve having a GAL who either has or has access to the expertise and resources of attorneys, lay volunteers, and caseworkers to perform the broad range of functions and services contained in the definition of the child advocate. Appended report on Phase I of the study and data-collection instruments
Main Term(s): Child victims
Index Term(s): Rights of minors ; Child abuse and neglect hearings ; Guardian ad litem ; Corrections ; Court procedures
Sale Source: Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information
P.O. Box 1182
Washington, DC 20013
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Presented in three parts
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=150732

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.