skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 166613 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Accuracy of Adult Recollections of Childhood Victimization: Part 1; Childhood Physical Abuse
Journal: Psychological Assessment  Volume:8  Issue:4  Dated:(1996)  Pages:412-421
Author(s): C S Widom; R L Shepard
Date Published: 1996
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Mental Health
Bethesda, MD 20852
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: MH49467; 86-IJ-CX-0033; 89-IJ-CX-0007; 93-IJ-CX-0031
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Using data from a study with prospective-cohorts design in which children who were physically abused, sexually abused, or neglected approximately 20 years ago were followed up, along with a matched control group, accuracy of adult recollections of childhood physical abuse was assessed.
Abstract: Two-hour, in-person interviews were conducted in young adulthood with 1,196 of the original 1,575 participants. Two measures, including the Conflict Tactics Scale, were used to assess histories of childhood physical abuse. Results show good discriminant validity and predictive efficiency of the self- report measures, despite substantial underreporting by physically abused respondents. Tests of construct validity reveal shared method variance, with self-report measures predicting self- reported violence and official reports of physical abuse predicting arrests for violence. Few studies have addressed the accuracy of retrospective recall of childhood physical abuse; however, in studies that have examined these issues, the results show that there is a substantial group of individuals who do not remember the physical abuse or do not report it in the context of a questionnaire or interview. This study explored one possible explanation associated with the fact that some of these individuals might have been too young at the time of the abuse experience to remember it accurately. These analyses did not reveal differences in accuracy by age at the time of the abuse experience, using age 5 as a cutoff. Unfortunately, by its very nature, family violence occurs in private, and this makes documenting its occurrence problematic. The determination of the nature of the events often depends on the report of the victim, and there may or may not be physical evidence available. If possible, researchers should use multiple sources of information. Failing that, researchers must recognize that, similar to the biases associated with official reports of childhood abuse and neglect, self-reported childhood victimization may contain systematic biases. For Part 2, see NCJ-166614. 6 tables and 50 references
Main Term(s): Victim attitudes
Index Term(s): Adult survivors of child sexual abuse; Child abuse; Child abuse investigations; Eyewitness memory; NIJ grant-related documents; Witness credibility
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=166613

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.