skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 177247 Find in a Library
Title: Federal Witness Protection Program: Its Evolution and Continuing Growing Pains
Journal: Criminal Justice Ethics  Volume:16  Issue:2  Dated:Summer/Fall 1997  Pages:20-34
Author(s): R N Slate
Date Published: 1997
Page Count: 15
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Following a description of the processing of protected witnesses under the Federal Witness Protection Program (WPP), this paper reviews the history and development of the WPP, considers the issue of protected witnesses who have violated and evaded the law while in the program, explains the Witness Security Reform Act of 1984, discusses ethical questions raised by the WPP, and offers recommendations for the program.
Abstract: With witness protection in mind, the WPP was established as part of Title V of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. It provided for the health, safety, and welfare of witnesses (and their families) who offered valuable testimony in organized crime proceedings. Some criticisms of the program include the charge that for those in the program the fundamental rights of privacy and personal autonomy, freedom of association, freedom of travel, and liberty are abrogated as a result of entrance into the WPP. The significance of this infringement on rights, however, is diminished by the fact that almost all protected witnesses have serious criminal records. This presents another problem, that is, witnesses with criminal backgrounds continuing to commit crimes under the protection of the WPP. This has occasioned court cases being brought by persons victimized by some in the WPP; such action is brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The Witness Security Reform Act of 1984 sought to address this problem by stipulating that witness "protection is prohibited where the need for a person's testimony is outweighed by the risk of danger to the public." Even with all the provisions incorporated within the Witness Security Reform Act of 1984, however, Sammy the Bull Gravano, who recently testified under Federal protection at the trial of reputed mob boss Vincent Gigante, was shielded from civil process servers by the presiding judge. This paper recommends that further research be devoted to providing a better assessment of the costs and benefits of the WPP without compromising the necessary secrecy and sensitivity of the WPP. It also suggests that a special committee be formed to scrutinize the decisions of those who are involved in the selection, processing, treatment, and monitoring of WPP participants. Finally, regardless of a witness' desire to leave the WPP, the government should be authorized to monitor anyone who has ever entered the WPP. Participants may refuse protection, but should be required to report at specified intervals to governmental authorities. 140 notes
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Federal programs; Witness immunity; Witness protection; Witness Security Program
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.