skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 
  NCJ Number: NCJ 204226     Find in a Library
  Title: Ethical Concerns in Forensic Consultation Regarding National Safety and Security (From Terrorism: Strategies for Intervention, P 95-107, 2003, Harold V. Hall, ed. -- See NCJ-204221)
  Author(s): Charles P. Ewing ; Michael G. Gelles
  Date Published: 2003
  Page Count: 13
  Annotation: This paper identifies and discusses some of the ethical issues involved in psychological and psychiatric consultations in which the client is a government agency seeking psychiatric insight regarding another individual in whom the client is interested; in such cases, the consultant must work within parameters set by law and/or dictated by concerns for public safety or national security.
  Abstract: In one type of such circumstance, the consultant has no direct access to the individual about whom psychological insight is being sought, but still the consultant's input may have serious consequences for the individual at issue as well as for legal, public-safety, and national security policies. In another type of circumstance, the consultant may have professional contact with the individual in question, but the law, national security, and/or public-safety concerns dictate that the true purpose of the contact with the individual be withheld from him/her. In both of these circumstances, certain elements of the consultant's role are dictated in part by legal parameters over which the consultant has no control or input. In the scenarios presented in this paper, the strict application of the prevailing ethical standards of psychology and psychiatry would preclude psychologists and psychiatrists from practicing under such circumstances. Still, under the grave dangers faced by the United States under the terrorist threat, the U.S. Government cannot afford to lose the input of mental health professionals in cases that involve national safety and security. Such input has been and will continue to be vital to protecting the lives of many Americans, both civilian and military, at home and abroad. There is a compelling and immediate need for the development of realistic ethical standards that are tailored to the specific circumstances and practices of mental health professionals engaged in such national-security matters. 10 references
  Main Term(s): Domestic Preparedness
  Index Term(s): Professional conduct and ethics ; Psychologists ; National security ; Counter-terrorism tactics ; Forensic psychology
  Sale Source: Haworth Press, Inc
10 Alice Street
Binghamton, NY 13904
United States of America
  Publisher URL: http://www.haworthpress.com 
  Type: Issue Overview
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=204226

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.