skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 204618 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Gender, Social Networks, and Residential Burglary
Journal: Criminology  Volume:41  Issue:3  Dated:August 2003  Pages:813-840
Author(s): Christopher W. Mullins; Richard Wright
Editor(s): Robert J. Bursik Jr.
Date Published: August 2003
Page Count: 27
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 89-IJ-CX-0046
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: To understand how the gendered social networks characteristic of streetlife influence male and female participation in, and accomplishment of, residential burglary, this federally supported study explored how gender structures residential burglary networks, opportunities, and meanings using in-depth interview data to make direct comparisons between male and female offenders.
Abstract: Previous research established that residential burglary is a prototypically social offense, shaped by ongoing relationships and interactions set in the broader world of streetlife. Residential burglars typically offend in groups, routinely use inside information gathered during their daily rounds to select potential targets, and frequently dispose of stolen goods through established networks. Given the highly social nature of residential burglary, the potential role played by gender in shaping the commission of the offense has received little research attention. This paper examined how gender structures women’s and men’s perceptions and expectations of their co-offenders, especially focusing on how female offenders negotiate the patriarchal perceptions of their male co-offenders. The paper attempted to expand the understanding of these important processes. Data were drawn from a larger sample of 105 active residential burglars, 18 females and 87 males. The study sample consisted of all 18 female offenders and 36 of the male offenders who were recruited in the early 1990's on the streets of St. Louis, MO. Study findings demonstrate that residential burglary is a significantly gender-stratified offense; the processes of initiation, commission, and potential desistance are heavily structured by gender norms. Women engaged in residential burglaries do not confront all of the gender issues that females face in violent offending, especially with respect to face-to-face impression management with targets, but they do have to negotiate male-dominated networks and landscapes in accomplishing their crimes. Gender is seen as playing the strongest role in shaping opportunity and the events leading up to residential burglaries, such as information gathering, while playing a lesser, but still important, role in molding actual offense commission. Once women successfully gain access to residential burglary networks, they tend to adopt accomplishment strategies very similar to male counterparts and co-offenders. In addition, women in the sample had to be mindful of their position within female-dominated domestic networks. This study expresses how gender stereotypes are expressed, reinforced, and exploited within streetlife social networks, and how these networks shape the lived experience of men and women engaged in residential burglary. References
Main Term(s): Gender issues
Index Term(s): Burglary; Comparative analysis; Female offenders; Male female offender comparisons; Male offenders; NIJ grant-related documents
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.