skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 210425 Find in a Library
Title: Restraining Orders in California: A Look at Statewide Data
Journal: Violence Against Women  Volume:11  Issue:7  Dated:July 2005  Pages:912-933
Author(s): Susan B. Sorenson; Haikang Shen
Date Published: July 2005
Page Count: 22
Sponsoring Agency: California Endowment
Los Angeles, CA 90012
California Wellness Foundation
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Publisher: http://online.sagepub.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study obtained administrative data on all types of restraining orders in force in California on June 6, 2003.
Abstract: Data were obtained from California's Domestic Violence Restraining Order System (DVROS), which contains all restraining orders issued in the State that have been delivered to and electronically entered into the database by a reporting agency. Data address the conditions of the order, the person to be protected, and the restrained person. Information is not provided on why the restraining order was sought. On June 6, 2003, there were 227,941 restraining orders against adults. All protected persons sought and were granted protection from another individual; however, not all of the restraining orders were for domestic violence. For 72.2 percent of the orders there was a restrained male and a protected female. This article provides information on the conditions of the restraining orders, prohibition against firearms purchase and possession by restrained persons, and serving the restraining order. One in six of the restraining orders recorded in DVROS had not been served, so the restrained person was unaware of being under a restraining order. The authors suggest greater use of specialized domestic violence courts in which applications for restraining orders are heard by specially trained and assigned judges or commissioners; this should increase jurisdictional consistency in the issuance and follow-up on restraining orders. 2 tables, 2 figures, 14 notes, and 31 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): California; Domestic assault; Domestic assault prevention; Restraining orders
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=210425

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.