skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 223951 Find in a Library
Title: Felony Murder Rule in Illinois: The Injustice of the Proximate Cause Theory Explored Via Research in Cognitive Psychology
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:98  Issue:2  Dated:Winter 2008  Pages:621-652
Author(s): Martin Lijtmaer
Date Published: 2008
Page Count: 32
Type: Research (Theoretical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article explores why the proximate cause theory has failed in its alleged purpose to limit the felony murder rule in Illinois and employs cognitive psychology as a means to explain the rule’s expansive application.
Abstract: The proximate cause theory holds felons accountable for any foreseeable deaths that occur during the commission or attempted commission of a felony. This includes deaths of innocent bystanders caused by third parties. Illinois courts have justified using proximate cause on the ground that the foreseeability requirement would temper the innate harshness of the felony murder rule. However, in practice, it has been applied expansively, extending liability even to those defendants whose actions appeared attenuated from their co-felon’s death. It has led to some anomalous results holding defendants liable for deaths they neither intended, nor could have foreseen happening. This article contributes to the long scholarly tradition of critiquing the felony murder rule of Illinois by focusing on the proximate cause theory and looking at the theory through the lens of cognitive psychology. The hindsight and outcome biases both reveal an inherent frailty in foreseeability inquiries. Thus, the felony murder defendant will be causally linked to a resulting death even if his/her participation in the felony did not directly lead to that death. In summation, there is a failure of the proximate cause theory as a limiting doctrine on the felony murder rule. Whereas the proximate cause theory is supposed to temper the innate harshness of the felony murder rule, in practice it is applied so expansively as to eliminate its limiting purpose.
Main Term(s): Felony murder
Index Term(s): Illinois; Innocent victims; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.