skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 90990 Find in a Library
Title: Seeing Through the Emperor's New Clothes - Rediscovery of Basic Principles in the Administration of Bail
Journal: Syracuse Law Review  Volume:34  Issue:2  Dated:(Spring 1983)  Pages:517-574
Author(s): J Carbone
Date Published: 1983
Page Count: 58
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The bail process should be reformed to make explicit the historical connection between pretrial restrictions and the predicted outcome of the trial.
Abstract: Bail has always reflected the judicial officer's prediction of the trial outcome by being set in accordance with the seriousness of the offense, the weight of the evidence, and the character of the accused person. However, bail commentators have tried to avoid an implication that the bail process might prejudice. Thus, they have insisted that bail's only purpose is to deter flight. However, their definition of the risk of flight has mirrored the predicted trial outcome. A better approach to the problem would be to openly accept the relationship between pretrial restrictions and trial outcome. The alternative would be to separate detention from probable criminal culpability and therefore to base detention on status only. Those who argue that bail based on predicted trial outcome violates the presumption of innocence incorrectly describe the role of presumption before trial. In addition, they ignore the possibility that detention justified solely by the risk of flight or by danger to the community may constitute an even greater violation of due process. The principle of proportionality should govern bail by requiring that pretrial restrictions reflect the likely penalty that would be imposed after the trial. Making the role of the charge explicit would then require a more rigorous pretrial review of the evidence. A total of 275 reference notes are provided.
Index Term(s): Bail reform; Bail/Financial Release
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=90990

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.