skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 241643   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Outcome and Process Evaluation of Juvenile Drug Courts Final Report
Author(s): Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. ; Carrie Sullivan, M.A. ; Lesli Blair, M.S. ; Christopher J. Sullivan, Ph.D. ; Paula Smith, Ph.D.
Date Published: 03/2013
Page Count: 421
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-DC-BX-0016
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Program/Project Description ; Program/Project Evaluation
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This national multi-site outcome and process evaluation involved nine juvenile drug courts from across the Nation.
Abstract: The evaluation assessed the relative effect of each court, as well as the courts’ combined effectiveness in achieving the goals of reducing recidivism and improving youths’ social functioning. Using the Evidence-Based Correctional Program Checklist - Drug Court (CPC-DC), which was developed by the Center for Criminal Justice Research (CCJR), the evaluation determined that two of the nine courts scored “effective” in the process evaluation; four scored “needs improvement;” and three scored “ineffective.” None of the courts scored in the “highly effective” category. Regarding outcomes, the key study findings raise important questions about the effectiveness of drug courts for juveniles. Clearly, there is a need for further discussion about the underlying theory and actual practice of juvenile drug courts in terms of effectiveness with the target population. Youth who participated in drug court had worse outcomes than youth on traditional probation. This finding persisted after controlling for risk level, time at risk, race, gender, substance of choice, frequency of substance use, previous drug and alcohol treatment, parental substance use, and mental health problems. There was significant variation in treatment outcomes by site, with only two drug courts showing a positive effect on recidivism in initial multivariate models. Self-report follow-up data from both groups indicate a high rate of substance use post-program for both youth who were in a drug court and youth in regular probation; however, the rate of substance use was less for drug-court youth. Youth who were successfully terminated from either drug court or probation had significantly lower odds of a later referral and/or adjudication than those who did not successfully complete those processes. 9 figures, 19 tables, extensive references, and appended data-collection forms, surveys, and statistical models
Main Term(s): Juvenile drug courts
Index Term(s): Drug treatment programs ; Drug treatment ; Program implementation ; Juvenile Corrections/Detention effectiveness ; Treatment effectiveness ; NIJ final report
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=263734

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.