skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 133133 Find in a Library
Title: Casino Capitalism? Insider Trading in Australia
Author(s): R Tomasic; B Pentony
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 172
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Institute of Criminology
Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia
Publication Number: ISBN 0-642-15877-0
Sale Source: Australian Institute of Criminology
GPO Box 2944
Canberra ACT, 2601,
Australia
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: The nature and dimensions of insider trading in Australia and the effectiveness of the law as a mechanism for insider trading control are examined.
Abstract: Although insider trading in Australia has been an offense under various Securities Industry Acts since 1970, no successful prosecution has occurred and no substantial body of judicial commentary has emerged. The current research effort, initiated in 1988, involved interviews with officials and professionals in Canberra, Melbourne, Perth, and Sydney. Mail responses were also obtained from officials in other capital cities. In addition, the study included principals and staff in broking houses, partners undertaking corporate work in Australia's four largest firms, merchant bankers, financial advisers and journalists, and industry group representatives. A common observation by both regulators and the regulated was that the law is not clear on insider trading. Regulatory authorities are reluctant to bring insider trading charges unless they have an extremely good chance in the courts. For this reason, much of the regulatory effort in respect to insider trading has been directed to informal enforcement without resort to the courts. The reliance on informal settlement means that the law has little, if any, deterrent effect. Informal settlements tend not to be publicized, and the result is an unsatisfactory law enforcement system. The book discusses legislative and judicial responses to insider trading, notes insider trading cases in Australia, and examines insider trading in the United States and the United Kingdom. The author specifically looks at the extent of insider trading in Australia and its effects, self-regulation and business ethics in relation to insider trading, the prosecution of insider trading, and insider trading law reform. An appendix provides additional details on the research methodology. References, tables, and endnotes
Main Term(s): Insider trading
Index Term(s): Australia; Crime in foreign countries; Foreign judicial systems; Professional conduct and ethics; White collar crime
Note: Australian Studies in Law, Crime and Justice
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=133133

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.