U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Democracy and Organized Crime Activities: Evidence From 59 Countries

NCJ Number
208227
Journal
Security Journal Volume: 17 Issue: 4 Dated: 2004 Pages: 21-34
Author(s)
Hung-En Sung
Date Published
2004
Length
14 pages
Annotation
This comparative analysis of 59 countries focused on the association between various levels of the democratization process and organized crime activities as perceived by business executives.
Abstract
Fifty-nine countries participated in the 2000 Executive Opinion Survey conducted by the Center for International Development at Harvard University and the World Economic Forum. A total of 4,022 business executives were selected and surveyed in a random design stratified by economic sector, producing an average of 68 responses per country. The index of organized crime was constructed based on responses to the question regarding whether organized crime imposed significant costs and was a burden to businesses. The widely used political-rights index computed by the Freedom House was used to measure the level of citizens' right to vote and to be elected, as well as to become involved in other political activities. This provided the indicator of level of democracy. This study found that higher perceptions of victimization by organized crime were reported by business executives in moderately democratic countries compared with authoritarian societies and advanced democracies. This suggests that the easiest and quickest achievements of democratization, i.e., the expansion of political rights and free elections, are linked with growth opportunities for criminal syndicates; however, with progress toward further democratization, organized crime becomes the focus of control mechanisms by more complex liberal institutions such as a professional and independent judiciary and investigative journalism. Further, evidence from past studies indicates that since criminal syndicates exploit noncompetitive markets to develop monopolistic or oligopolistic influences through extortion, bid-rigging, price-fixing, bribery, or cartel agreements in particular industries, effective measures to encourage open and competitive markets are good anti-organized-crime policies. 3 tables, 1 figure, 32 notes, and appended listing of countries with democracy and organized-crime indexes for each country

Downloads

No download available

Availability