skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 179001     Find in a Library
  Title: Does Your Youth Program Work?
  Document URL: HTML PDF 
  Corporate Author: National Crime Prevention Council
United States of America
  Date Published: 04/2000
  Page Count: 6
  Series: OJJDP Youth in Action Series
  Annotation: This paper emphasizes the importance of conducting evaluations of youth programs, and then offers suggestions for designing and implementing a program evaluation.
  Abstract: Evaluations are crucial in determining a program's impact and in identifying aspects of the program that should be modified or eliminated to better achieve program goals. Evaluations can also help determine whether the planned activities have been implemented and whether the program has reached its audience, changed attitudes or behaviors, increased knowledge, and addressed the targeted problem. Common evaluation techniques are interviews with stakeholders, analysis of existing data, onsite program reviews, reviews of program materials and reports, and surveys of key groups. The evaluation design and techniques should be determined in the course of the initial planning and design of the program. Because an evaluation essentially answers questions about the program, these questions should be formulated at the outset. They should be appropriate for the program and clearly linked to the program's goals and objectives. Further, the evaluation must determine the information needed to answer the evaluation questions and how and when this information is to be obtained. Data must be collected consistently and accurately, and the data should measure only what can be used; moreover, the evaluation should use only what has been measured. The paper concludes with an overview of the challenges and rewards of an evaluation.
  Main Term(s): Juvenile program evaluation
  Index Term(s): Juvenile delinquency prevention ; Evaluation criteria ; Evaluation measures ; Evaluation utilization ; Juvenile rehabilitation ; Juvenile treatment evaluation
  Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Type: Instructional Material
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: From Youth in Action, Number 17, April 2000
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.