skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 184232   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Factors Related to Domestic Violence Court Dispositions in a Large Urban Area: The Role of Victim/Witness Reluctance and Other Variables, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
  Author(s): Joanne Belknap Ph.D. ; Dee L. R. Graham Ph.D.
  Date Published: 06/2000
  Page Count: 257
  Annotation: This research study helps fill the knowledge gap about what happens with domestic violence cases in which alleged batterers are arrested, once they leave law enforcement agencies, using data from the Cincinnati, Ohio, urban area.
  Abstract: Most research on domestic violence and the criminal justice system focuses on the police response to victims and batterers and relatively little research has attempted to understand how courts operate in response to battered women and their batterers. Many prosecutors have failed to prosecute arrested batterers, and judges have frequently failed to convict them. Accordingly, the current study was conducted to identify factors affecting misdemeanor domestic violence cases in the Cincinnati urban area, cases in which batterers were arrested by the police, resulted in dismissals, acquittals, or convictions in the courts and how these cases were processed. Key to the study was awareness of victim/reluctance to testify against batterers. Data were collected from pretrial services files; interviews with prosecutors, judges, and public defenders; content analysis of court transcripts; and detailed interviews with and surveys of domestic violence victims. Multivariate analyses showed that the following variables were never significantly related to whether the defendant was found guilty: the defendant's age; the defendant's race; the defendant's prior criminal record; whether the defendant kicked or hit; whether the defendant stabbed, cut, or used a gun; whether the victim was subpoenaed; the availability of 911 tapes; whether the police testified; and the judge's sex. The most important variable predicting whether the defendant was found guilty was the number of times the prosecutor met with the victim. Results showed that study participants could benefit from more education and awareness about the dynamics of domestic violence, 80 percent reported victim behavior as an obstacle to conviction of batterers, court professionals overwhelmingly reported disdain and even distrust of victim advocates, and the decision to publicly prosecute a domestic violence case involved a calculated allocation of court resources. Recommendations for reducing victim/witness reluctance to testify are offered, and policy and research implications of the findings are discussed. The major recommendation is to have someone within the system whose job it is to explain the system to victims and to work to make victim interaction with the system effective. Policy implications include training court professionals, giving more attention to processing of cases without victim cooperation, creating victim support projects, and adding more prosecutors. References and tables
  Main Term(s): Court research
  Index Term(s): Male offenders ; Urban area studies ; Prosecution ; Domestic assault ; Abused women ; Urban criminality ; Female victims ; Victims of violence ; Violent men ; Ohio
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 96-WT-NX-0004
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.