skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 193403     Find in a Library
  Title: An Honest Chance: Perspectives on Drug Courts, Executive Summary
  Document URL: HTML 
  Author(s): John S. Goldkamp ; Michael D. White ; Jennifer B. Robinson
  Corporate Author: Crime and Justice Research Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 04/2002
  Page Count: 6
  Annotation: This report presents the perspectives of drug court participants in six American drug courts.
  Abstract: In the design and operation of drug courts around the country, certain assumptions have been made about drug courts and their participants, such as assumptions about the role of the courtroom, drug testing, and the use of sanctions. This study employed a focus group method to evaluate the experiences of drug court participants. Twelve focus groups were convened at 6 sites with nearly 150 drug court participants. Participants discussed their drug histories and motivations for entering drug court, the courtroom experience, the treatment experience, use of drugs and crime during treatment, and recommendations for improving drug courts. The findings are presented in juxtaposition to the common assumptions made about drug courts and include the observation that drug courts are effective at drug treatment because of judicial supervision and closely coordinated treatments. However, most drug court participants do not enter drug court for its treatment aspect, but rather to avoid a sentence of incarceration. Many participants credited the judge’s hands-on style of supervision as effective, yet many participants also noted that drug use and crime engagement were not uncommon among drug court participants. Suggestions to improve drug courts include enhanced drug testing, employment assistance, and after-hours telephone hotlines. Note
  Main Term(s): Program evaluation ; Drug Courts
  Index Term(s): Perception ; Drug offenders
  Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
Drug Courts Program Office
United States of America
  Grant Number: 1998-DC-VX-0102
  Sale Source: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs
Drug Courts Program Office
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.