skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 193429   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Evaluation of the Dallas Police Department's Interactive Community Policing Program 1995-1999, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Charles Mindel ; Richard F. Dangel ; Wayne Carson ; Maria L. Mays
  Corporate Author: University of Texas at Arlington
United States of America
  Date Published: 10/2000
  Page Count: 282
  Annotation: This report presents the methodology and findings of an evaluation that examined the implementation and impact of the Interactive Community Policing (ICP) program of the Dallas Police Department (DPD) from 1995 to 1999.
  Abstract: The evaluation was designed to determine the activities of the ICP program, barriers to program implementation, and the effects of the ICP program. A total of 4,325 Dallas residents completed telephone surveys over the 4 years of the evaluation, and written surveys were annually administered to all ICP officers, as well as to a randomly selected sample of officers ranked sergeant and below throughout the department. ICP officer activities generally were in six categories: code enforcement, drug enforcement, gang abatement, school activities, neighborhood clean up, and community meetings. Six categories of barriers to the implementation of community policing were identified: issues concerning resources, lack of acceptance of the program by patrol officers, issues concerning ICP management, issues concerning citizens, issues concerning ICP personnel, and problems with city services. Steps taken to address these barriers are described. The findings of 4 years of citizen surveys found mixed results in citizen views of social disorder, minimal belief that the neighborhood had improved, significant increases in satisfaction with their neighborhood, an overall reduction in fear of crime, an overall decline in the use of security measures, and a similarity in crime victimization between high ICP areas and low ICP areas. Recognition of the ICP program remained relatively low. Data were also obtained on citizen perceptions of police activity, police performance, and police availability. Officer perceptions of the ICP program and citizens pertain to the allocation of departmental resources, likely changes with the implementation of ICP, officer responsibilities, officer decision making autonomy, trust between officers and citizens, and citizen roles and contributions. An assessment of the effects of community policing on citizens' evaluations of police performance found that citizens living in low ICP neighborhoods graded police higher than did residents of high ICP areas when considering issues of police visibility and knowing officers. Extensive tables, 50 references, survey questionnaires
  Main Term(s): Community policing
  Index Term(s): Police effectiveness ; Program implementation ; Public Opinion of the Police ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Texas
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0070
  Sale Source: University of Texas at Arlington
Box 19145
Arlington, TX 76019
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.