skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 194027     Find in a Library
Title: False Burglar Alarms
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Rana Sampson
Date Published: 2001
Page Count: 43
  Annotation: This guide examines current police responses and presents alternative strategies to address the false alarm dilemma.
Abstract: The vast majority of police alarm calls -- between 94 and 98 percent -- are false (higher in some jurisdictions). Each false alarm requires approximately 20 minutes of police time, usually for two officers; this costs the public as much as $1.5 billion per year in police time. This guide begins by reviewing the three main factors that increase the risks of false burglar alarms: faulty or inappropriately selected equipment, poor installation, and user error. For the purposes of this guide, it is assumed that the alarm industry has the responsibility to improve the quality of its equipment, properly install devices, and increase user knowledge of its product, all of which reduce false calls; therefore, this guide focuses on police policy remedies to devise a more appropriate response and stimulate the alarm industry to further improve the overall reliability of its products. One section of the guide lists questions that a police agency should address in assessing the problem of false alarms in its jurisdiction. Answers to these questions should help the agency design a more effective response strategy. Since the measurement of the effectiveness of a given response strategy is crucial for efficient policing, the guide presents some potentially useful measures of the effectiveness of responses to false alarms. This is followed by summaries of police responses to false alarms that have proven to be most effective. They are as follows: requiring alarm companies to visually verify alarm legitimacy before calling the police; charging a fee for service for all false holdup, duress, and panic alarms; and responding to holdup, duress, and panic alarms only if they come from a stationary building. Responses with limited effectiveness include establishing a fee for service for all false alarm calls; establishing an ordinance with escalating fines for false alarms; accepting dispatch cancellation; alerting alarm companies about false alarm abusers; publishing alarm companies' false alarm rates on websites or elsewhere; holding false alarm classes; and lowering the call priority of alarms. The response specifically not recommended is to respond "priority one" to alarm calls. 16 notes, 31 references, and appended summary of responses to false burglar alarms
Main Term(s): Problem-Oriented Policing
Index Term(s): Alarm systems ; False alarms ; Police policies and procedures
Sponsoring Agency: US Department of Justice
United States of America
Contract Number: 99-CK-WX-K004
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

US Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20530
United States of America
Type: Instructional Material
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Problem-Oriented Guides for Police Series, No. 5.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.