skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 194105   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Evaluation of the Safe Streets Now! Approach: Civil Remedies for Drugs, Crime, and Nuisance Problems
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Jan Roehl Ph.D. ; Kristin Guertin MPA
  Corporate Author: Criminal Justice Research Ctr
United States of America
  Date Published: 12/2000
  Page Count: 144
  Series: NIJ Research Report
  Annotation: This document assesses the effectiveness, benefits, costs, and consequences of replicating the program called Safe Streets Now!
  Abstract: Safe Streets Now! (SSN) is a non-profit organization that has developed a unique civil remedy approach to location-specific crime, drug, and nuisance problems. The signature activity, its primary civil remedy, is the filing of small claims court actions against property owners who refuse to address known problems on their property. The aim of the program is to help citizens resolve specific neighborhood problems and empower those citizens in ways that encourage additional problem solving and strengthening neighborhoods. This evaluation relied on three major methods: a national survey of 35 programs; case studies of four programs with different local sponsors; and impact studies that were conducted for seven neighborhoods. Results showed that overall, it appeared that the SSN approach was an excellent one for eliminating or reducing problems on specific properties. The vast majority of cases were resolved without resorting to filing small claims cases; most were resolved through notification and negotiations with the property owner. When claims were filed, the residents prevailed most of the time. Although citizen fears of retaliation from problem tenants and property owners were high and affected local participation, actual acts of retaliation were few and minor. There are indications that SSN is a cost-effective approach. A major factor in SSN failing to be implemented at the local level was the concern cities have expressed about municipality liability in sponsoring the program. In police departments, it appears that SSN tends to become another tool used among many for problem solving. In the case studies, it was clear that the success of a local SSN program was closely tied to the expertise, reputation, and charisma of the program director. The central recommendation is that local jurisdictions will benefit from the implementation of a SSN program. Appendices
  Main Term(s): Program evaluation ; Location specific crime
  Index Term(s): Geographic distribution of crime ; Street crimes ; Program monitoring ; Services effectiveness ; User evaluation ; Program design
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 98-IJ-CX-0058
  Sale Source: Criminal Justice Research Ctr
2000 14th Street, NW
Eighth Floor
Washington, DC 20009
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Description
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.