skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 194119   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Private Versus Public Sector Operation: A Comparison of the Environmental Quality in Juvenile Correctional Facilities, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Gaylene S. Armstrong Ph.D. ; Doris L. MacKenzie Ph.D.
Corporate Author: University of Maryland
Dept of Criminal Justice and Criminology
United States of America
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 186
  Annotation: This study assessed the implications of privatization in juvenile corrections through an analysis of the environmental quality of conditions of confinement in both public and private juvenile correctional facilities.
Abstract: For this study, "privatization" referred to the "process wherein the State continues to fund the costs of incarceration of delinquents but the private sector provides the custodial and programmatic managerial services." The research analyzed data collected from 48 juvenile correctional facilities throughout the United States (16 privately operated facilities and 32 publicly operated facilities). Data pertained to the quality of conditions of confinement as perceived by juvenile delinquents (n=4,590), correctional staff (n=1,362), and facility administrators (n=48). This report first provides a historical synopsis of the role of the private sector within the adult correctional system. This synopsis is contrasted with the historical role of the private sector in the juvenile correctional system. The report then profiles the debates and issues surrounding correctional-facility privatization as argued by supporters and opponents. The final section of the literature review discusses the measurement structure the researchers used to examine the quality of the juvenile correction environment. The five research questions explored in the current research focused on differences in the demographic composition and risk levels of the juvenile populations in private and public facilities, differences in staff characteristics, resident and staff perceptions of conditions of confinement, the adjustment of residents in the two types of facilities, and the work experiences of the correctional staff. The study found no significant differences in the demographics and risk factors of the juveniles in the two types of facilities. Private facilities employed staff that were significantly younger, had less prior experience in correctional facilities, and had been employed for a shorter time. Compared to public facilities, private facilities were significantly smaller, newer, and had a more intensive admission process for residents. There were no statistically significant differences in the quality of the perceived conditions of confinement between the two types of facilities. Juveniles in private facilities experienced a statistically significant increase in their level of anxiety and a decrease in the level of social bonds, but the differences were still small. The operating sector did not significantly impact any of the four measures of staff work experiences. 19 tables, 2 figures, and 91 references
Main Term(s): Privatization in corrections
Index Term(s): Juvenile correctional facilities ; Comparative analysis ; Juvenile inmates ; Juvenile inmate attitudes ; Adjustment to prison ; Prison conditions ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 99-IJ-CX-0061
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Arizona State University West
Administration of Justice
4701 W. Thunderbird Road
P.O. Box 37100
Phoenix, AZ 85069-7100
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.