skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 194125   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: From Whether to How Drug Courts Work: Retrospective Evaluation of Drug Courts in Clark County (Las Vegas) and Multnomah County (Portland), Executive Summary
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): John S. Goldkamp ; Michael D. White ; Jennifer B. Robinson
  Corporate Author: Crime and Justice Research Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 2001
  Page Count: 71
  Series: NIJ Research Report
  Annotation: This report summarizes Phase II findings from the national evaluation of the Portland (Multnomah County) and Las Vegas (Clark County) drug courts, two of the longest functioning and most highly recognized drug courts in the United States.
  Abstract: In the first part of this report, participant outcomes and service delivery are discussed, based on in-depth analyses of criminal justice and treatment outcomes. The second part of the evaluation focused on drug court workload, judicial staffing, acupuncture, and participant fees. The third section of the report addresses the early disposition program in Multnomah County, and drug courts are analyzed in their geographic context. Descriptions of the rural and juvenile "spin-off" drug courts in Clark County are included. The concluding section of the report presents a causal model of drug court impact based on the evaluation findings; it is applied in analyses of the Clark County and Multnomah County drug courts. By stating on a general level that a drug court should reduce an offender's criminal behavior, the causal model specifies that numerous contacts with the judge, a regular program of drug testing, attendance in appropriate treatment services, positive incentives, and acupuncture all serve as instrumental functions that translate into favorable drug court outcomes. Favorable outcomes among participants include not dropping out at an early stage, producing favorable interim progress reports, attending court as required, and graduating with all tasks satisfactorily completed. According to the causal drug court model, favorable drug court achievements produce favorable subsequent behavior in the form of fewer rearrests, lower fugitive rates from the justice process, reduced substance abuse, and other measures of law-abiding citizenship. In both of the drug court study sites, the expected positive relationship between longer times in treatment during the first year and drug court graduation (measured at 2 years) was found. The analysis concludes that under certain circumstances drug courts can deliver the advertised crime-reduction effect; "outside" factors account for some of the variation in their impact over time; and variation in the remainder of the drug court effect must be explained by factors internal to the drug court. 22 figures and 9 references
  Main Term(s): Drug Courts
  Index Term(s): Drug treatment ; Drug offenders ; Court management ; Corrections effectiveness ; Court procedures ; NIJ final report ; Nevada ; Oregon
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 98-DC-VX-K001
  Sale Source: Crime and Justice Research Institute
520 N. Columbus Blvd., Suite 600
Philadelphia, PA 19123
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Report (Summary)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: For the full report, see NCJ-194124.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.