skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 194339   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Unintended Impacts of Sentencing Guidelines on Family Structure, Revised Technical Report
Author(s): Samuel L. Myers Jr. ; Roy Wilkins
Corporate Author: University of Minnesota
Hubert H Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs and School of Social Work
United States of America
Date Published: 01/2000
Page Count: 116
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 96-CE-VX-0015
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

University of Minnesota
Hubert H Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs and School of Social Work
267 19th Ave
S 909 Social Sci
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Technical)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This federally funded report studied the potential impacts of sentencing reforms and incarceration on the family structure. The problem was examined from various angles to understand the causal relationships between male withdrawal from productive areas of the economy and resulting changes in the community and families.
Abstract: Funded and supported by U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, this study examined potential adverse impacts on families due to sentencing reforms and resulting incarceration. The main hypothesis of the study was that when there was an increase in incarceration due to changes in sentencing policies the supply of marriageable men was depleted causing an increase in female-headed families. To assess the impacts of incarceration and/or reforms on family structure and stability, different data sets, as well as a variety of statistical methods were used. In using these different data sets and statistical measures, three research models were designed to test the hypothesis. In Module A, the flow of inmates within a specific geographic area was examined to see how it contributed to individual probabilities of family disruption. The analysis for Module A merged the Urban Institute’s Underclass Database (UDB), the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) data set, and the National Correctional Reporting Program (NCRP) data set for counties. Module B was interested in whether sentencing reforms affected mate availability and/or female family headship. It examined the effects of statewide incarceration and sentencing changes on marriage markets and family structure. Lastly, Module C focused on a single State that had undergone major and puntatively successful sentencing reform. This analysis looked at the State of Minnesota and interviewed a random sample of 500 inmates about their family backgrounds, children, and marital relations. Results of the three modules supported parts of the underlying hypothesis that imprisonment increased female-headed families. However, there were no strong or significant indicators of the adverse impacts of sentencing reforms on family structures despite strong and consistent evidence that lower supplies of marriageable men were associated with higher incidences of female-headed families. Appendices, tables, and references
Main Term(s): Sentencing guidelines
Index Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions ; Sentencing reform ; Legislative impact ; Single parent families ; Family structure ; NIJ final report ; NIJ grant-related documents
Note: Also Includes the Non-Technical Report Version.
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=194339

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.