skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 195792   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Domestic Violence, Visitation and Custody Decisions in New York Family Courts, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Chris O'Sullivan Ph.D.
  Corporate Author: Safe Horizon
United States of America
  Date Published: 05/2002
  Page Count: 60
  Annotation: This study investigated the frequency of visitation and custody appeals by batterers and documented the response of the court when an abusive partner applied for visitation.
  Abstract: Child protective services tend to hold mothers accountable for the harm to children of witnessing intimate partner violence despite the fact that women are more often the victims of physical abuse than men. Battered women can be charged with neglect for failure to protect their children from witnessing violence. Victims of domestic abuse can face loss of custody of their children if they do not separate from the abusive partner. Ironically, when a woman does separate from an abuser who is the father of her children, the court may grant his petition for visitation. A review of Family Court records in New York City and suburban Westchester County was conducted. The hypotheses were that (1) increased awareness of the impact of domestic violence on children would limit court-ordered access to children by a parent who had abused the other parent; and (2) the court was aware that domestic violence was typically a behavior pattern with a history of abuse and the probability of continuing abuse. In New York City, the findings indicate that family offense petitions and protection orders had little or no impact on the courts’ decisions regarding visitation and custody. The courts were granting visitation in most cases when there was evidence or an allegation of ongoing violence or threats by one parent against the other. In Westchester County, 51 percent of fathers enjoined by a protection order were granted visitation. Fathers were significantly more likely to be granted visitation in both New York City and Westchester County when they were enjoined by a protection order than when no family offense petition had been filed. The evidence suggests that visitation should be denied more often--at least as a temporary measure. Judges seem reluctant to suspend or deny visitation, and instead may resort to delaying tactics. The problem of visitation and custody in domestic violence cases certainly warrants further investigation. 28 references
  Main Term(s): Domestic assault ; Judicial attitudes ; Parental visitation rights
  Index Term(s): Marital problems ; Child abuse ; Home environment ; Domestic relations ; Family offenses ; Parental rights ; Child custody
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 98-IJ-CX-0021
  Sale Source: Safe Horizon
2 Lafayette Street
New York, NY 10007
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  Note: See NCJ-195793 for the Executive Summary
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.