skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 196548     Find in a Library
Title: Do Domestic Violence Services Save Lives?
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Laura Dugan ; Daniel S. Nagin ; Richard Rosenfeld
  Journal: National Institute of Justice Journal  Issue:250  Dated:November 2003  Pages:20 to 25
Date Published: 11/2003
Page Count: 6
  Annotation: This article discusses policies and services designed to help victims of domestic violence.
Abstract: Policies and services designed to help victims of domestic violence appear to have two possible and opposing effects: either they decrease the abuse and risk of homicide, or they have the unintended consequences of increasing them. Some interventions that reduce contact between intimate partners in violent relationships also reduce opportunities for further abuse and potential homicide attempts. But certain interventions designed to help victims gain access to helpful resources may actually increase the risk of homicide because they have a backlash or retaliation effect. The outcome depends on the type of intervention and the characteristics of the victim and the offender. Reducing the contact between the intimate partners lowers the chances that one will kill the other. This is called exposure reduction. Two policies support exposure reduction: warrantless arrest laws and higher Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) benefit levels. A retaliation effect or backlash may be triggered by an intervention, such as a restraining order, arrest, or shelter protection. Two policies appear to provoke backlash: prosecutor willingness to take cases of protection order violation, and the relative education of the partners. Research found a number of factors that supported both exposure reduction and backlash theories, but only among different groups, based on marital status, gender, and race. These factors included: (1) State laws requiring mandatory arrest for violating a protection order; (2) the availability of contempt, misdemeanor, or felony charges for violating a protection order; (3) State laws providing for no-contact orders, custody relief, or protection beyond cohabitation; (4) agencies with dedicated budgets for legal advocacy and with lawyers on staff; and (5) pro-arrest and mandatory arrest policies for protection order violations and mandatory arrest for domestic assault. The fact that retaliation occurs doesn’t mean that prevention strategies are a bad idea. Instead, prevention should be tailored to individual needs. 1 figure, 16 notes
Main Term(s): Domestic assault ; Domestic assault prevention
Index Term(s): Family counseling ; Domestic relations ; Police crisis intervention ; Crisis intervention training ; Counseling techniques ; Domestic assault arrest policies
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Description
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.