skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 197899     Find in a Library
Title: Law Enforcement and Corrections Family Support: Development and Evaluation of a Stress Management Program for Officers and Their Spouses, Executive Summary
Series: NIJ Research Report
Author(s): Rudy Arredondo Ed.D. ; Sterling T. Shumway Ph.D. ; Thomas G. Kimball Ph.D. ; Charlotte A. Dersch Ph.D. ; C. Nichole Morelock M.S. ; Laura Bryan M.S.
Date Published: 11/2002
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 99-FS-VX-0005
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Report (Summary)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report summarizes the development and evaluation of a program that provided an innovative stress prevention and treatment program for police officers and their families.
Abstract: The 8-week program consisted of three components: didactic group presentations, processing/treatment groups, and ongoing support groups led by peer mentors. An experimental design was used to test the program's effectiveness. The evaluation design included randomized selection of participants, random assignment to the experimental or control group, and pretest/posttest follow-up assessment. The experimental group attended the 8-week didactic/treatment groups, and a smaller sample of officers and their significant others attended the peer mentoring support groups. The experimental group consisted of 19 participants. Questionnaires were provided to both experimental and control group participants prior to the beginning of treatment, at completion, and again at 6-month follow-up. Objective baseline data (e.g., sick leave, emergency leave, family sick leave, and work performance evaluations) were collected from departmental records prior to the treatment and at the end of the year following completion of the program. A total of 32 officers responded to the qualitative survey, with 4 from the experimental group, 12 from the control group, and 16 from the nonparticipating/control group. Most officers, regardless of their group, agreed that having a police family stress program was a "good idea." In the initial qualitative survey, the police officers were split as to the origin of their stress. Two sub-themes emerged from follow-up phone interviews (job-related stress and other stressors). Half of the participants stated that their stress was directly related to their role as a police officer. Other officers indicated that family relationships and financial issues were the main sources of their stress. Program participants identified the group process as the most helpful factor in the couple groups, notably, the ability of the facilitators to create an open and comfortable atmosphere. Program participants indicated they would have appreciated more ownership of the curriculum. The peer-mentoring group was viewed by most as a positive experience, but they wished for more structure and guidance regarding the topics covered. Participants identified the following factors as contributing to their decision to participate in the training: learning how to handle stress and understanding their spouse. Participants viewed other officers as having a generally negative perception of program participation, based in fear of being stereotyped for participation in the program and fear about confidentiality.
Main Term(s): Police occupational stress
Index Term(s): Stress management ; Police family issues ; Police stress training ; NIJ final report
Note: See NCJ-197900 for the final report.
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=197899

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.