skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 199407   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Outcome Evaluation of the South Carolina Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program for State Prisoners
Author(s): J. Mitchell Miller Ph.D. ; Barbara Koons-Witt Ph.D.
Corporate Author: University of South Carolina
Dept of Criminology and Criminal Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 09/2002
Page Count: 88
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2000-RT-VX-K001
Sale Source: University of South Carolina
Dept of Criminology and Criminal Justice
1305 Greene St.
Columbia, SC 29208
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Program/Project Description
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article presents an evaluation of South Carolina’s Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for State Prisoners, known as the Correctional Recovery Academy (CRA).
Abstract: The authors note that the growth in the prison population is due mainly to drug-related crime recidivism and the law enforcement focus on drug activities. As such, it makes sense to offer drug treatment programs within correctional facilities. Indeed, such an approach has several advantages over treatment centers, which are independent of correctional facilities. Residential treatment settings can ensure enrollment and participation and can ensure post-release aftercare as a condition of parole. This evaluation measured the success of South Carolina’s CRA program at reducing recidivism among young male drug offenders with chemical dependency problems. The evaluation involved comparing 303 offenders, 160 of whom were enrolled in the CRA program and 143 of whom were not. Results of statistical analyses, including T-test, chi-square, and logistic regression, revealed that during the 12-month follow-up period, the CRA program did not significantly reduce recidivism rates among the CRA participants. Indeed, the CRA participants were actually re-arrested at a slightly higher rate than the offenders who were not enrolled in the treatment program. The results thus show that the CRA program failed at both reducing recidivism among drug-related offenders and in reducing drug-use relapse during the same period. In conclusion, the authors note that an unexpected conclusion was the failure rate for drug testing covaried with the total number of drug tests given. This finding possibly indicates that if more drug tests are given, the rate of “dirty urine” results would decline. Bibliography, glossary
Main Term(s): Program evaluation ; Inmate drug treatment
Index Term(s): Recidivism ; Treatment effectiveness ; NIJ grant-related documents ; South Carolina
Note: Dataset may be archived by the NIJ Data Resources Program at the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=199407

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.