skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 208129   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Relationship between Race, Ethnicity, and Sentencing Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Sentencing Research
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Ojmarrh Mitchell ; Doris L. MacKenzie
  Date Published: 12/2004
  Page Count: 193
  Annotation: This report presents the summary and the final report of a meta-analysis of the research literature regarding the relationship between race/ethnicity and sentencing outcomes.
  Abstract: A substantial body of research has investigated the relationship between race/ethnicity and sentencing outcomes; the findings have often been quite divergent. The purpose of the current study was to objectively and comprehensively review the literature in this area using the quantitative method of meta-analysis. In addition to investigating whether there is racial disparity in sentencing outcomes, this study addressed why the research literature has produced inconsistent findings. The meta-analysis concentrates on five types of sentencing outcomes: (1) imprisonment decisions; (2) length of incarcerative sentence; (3) simultaneous examinations of imprisonment and sentence length decisions; (4) discretionary lenience; and (5) discretionary punitiveness. A total of 85 studies meeting eligibility requirements were pulled from various bibliographic databases, such as the National Criminal Justice Reference Service and Sociological Abstracts. The magnitude and direction of observed racial disparities from each study were calculated. Results of analysis of variances and multiple regression analyses indicated that African-American and Latinos were generally sentenced more punitively than were Whites; this effect remained after controlling for defendant criminal history and current offense seriousness. Sentencing disparities were observed for studies that examined drug offenses, imprisonment or discretionary sentencing decisions, and in recent Federal court data analyses. Evidence also suggested that sentencing guidelines were associated with smaller sentencing disparities. Overall, the meta-analysis calls into question the argument that there is no or minimal racial/ethnic sentencing disparity operating in American courts. Policymakers are called upon to re-evaluate sentencing practices. Tables, figures, appendixes, references
  Main Term(s): Sentencing disparity ; Race-punishment relationship
  Index Term(s): Racial discrimination ; Secondary data analysis ; Sentencing trends ; NIJ grant-related documents
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2002-IJ-CX-0020
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.