skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 209926     Find in a Library
  Title: Research Priorities: Law Enforcement in Public Law 280 States
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Carole Goldberg ; Heather Valdez Singleton
  Date Published: 1998
  Page Count: 19
  Annotation: This paper describes the 1953 Federal legislation, Public Law 280 authorizing State criminal jurisdiction into Indian country, and its impact on Indians in Indian country and the need and importance for research on Public Law 280 specific to Federal Indian policy and law enforcement issues.
  Abstract: In the past, States lacked criminal jurisdiction over crimes committed by Indians in Indian country. However, in 1953 the first comprehensive Federal legislation to introduce State criminal jurisdiction into Indian country was enacted and is known as Public Law 280. Unfortunately, it was adopted and implemented without the consent of the affected tribes thereby, and it did not provide any Federal financial support for the new State law enforcement responsibilities. Even though some clarity has been given to Public Law 280, there are still areas of uncertainty. Public Law 280 did not expressly abolish tribal justice system jurisdiction, diminish the Federal Government’s overall trust responsibility to tribes, or reject Federal obligations to provide services to tribes. Public Law 280 has stimulated tribal protests and complaints. Even though studies have been conducted on Public Law 280, it has not received research attention commensurate with its importance to Federal Indian policy and law enforcement concerns. Qualitative studies on the impact of Public Law 280 are hindered by current data collection practices. There is a need to improve data gathering, record keeping, and data analysis regarding crime in Indian country affected by Public Law 280. Recommended priorities for new quantitative research regarding Public Law 280 are presented in the areas of crime rates in Indian country, quality of law enforcement, documentation and evaluation of Federal law enforcement funding and services to tribes, assessment of law enforcement, evaluation of retrocession and concurrent tribal jurisdiction, cooperative agreements, and Federal administrative and legislative responses. References
  Main Term(s): Indian justice
  Index Term(s): Reservation law enforcement ; Tribal history ; Legislation ; Indian affairs ; American Indians ; Legislative impact ; Legislative issues
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.