skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 213003   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Of Fragmentation and Ferment: The Impact of State Sentencing Policies on Incarceration Rates, 1975-2002
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Don Stemen ; Andres Rengifo ; James Wilson
Corporate Author: Vera Institute of Justice
United States of America
Date Published: 08/2005
Page Count: 225
  Annotation: This study conducted a comprehensive survey of U.S. State sentencing and corrections policies implemented between 1975 and 2002, in order to assess the impact of those policies on State incarceration rates during this period.
Abstract: The study found that States with a combination of determinate sentencing (abolition of discretionary parole release) and presumptive sentencing guidelines had lower incarceration rates and a smaller growth in these rates than other States. These policies had to be implemented in combination in order to have this effect. States with separate time-served requirements for violent offenders had higher incarceration rates than States without such requirements, and States with a higher number of sentencing extensions for drug offenses had comparatively higher incarceration rates. Also, States with a higher number of mandatory sentencing laws had higher incarceration rates; however, no link was found between laws that increased prison sentences for second-time or third-time offenders and the incarceration rate. Factors other than law and policy that increased incarceration rates were higher property-crime rates, larger minority populations, a higher unemployment rate, more revenue per capita, a higher number of arrests for drug offenses, a Republican governor, a higher number of religiously conservative residents, and a higher number of politically conservative residents. States with higher income per capita and more generous welfare benefits had lower incarceration rates. Using a pooled time-series cross-sectional design and using data for all 50 States obtained from several government sources, the study isolated the influence of sentencing and corrections policies on changes in State incarceration rates between 1975 and 2002. The analysis controlled for a number of demographic, economic, ideological, and crime-related variables. Extensive tables, 140 references, and 5 appendixes with supplementary descriptions of data collection and analysis
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Sentencing/Sanctions ; State laws ; Incarceration and Imprisonment ; Sentencing guidelines ; State-by-state analyses ; Prison overcrowding ; Sentencing trends ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2002-IJ-CX-0027
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.