skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 214115     Find in a Library
  Title: Maximize Your Evaluation Dollars
  Document URL: HTML 
  Author(s): Edwin Zedlewski ; Mary B. Murphy
  Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:254  Dated:July 2006  Pages:16 to 19
  Date Published: 07/2006
  Page Count: 4
  Series: NIJ Journal
  Annotation: This article describes the National Institute of Justice’s approach in identifying which programs are more likely to yield evaluations that maximize a State or local agency’s return on its investment, thereby saving governments’ time and money.
  Abstract: In assessing whether a program can sustain a rigorous outcome evaluation, an evaluability assessment must first be conducted. In the second step, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) reads the complete files of potential programs for evaluation reducing the list of potential candidates. Program managers must be able to explain how the program’s primary activities contribute to its eventual goals. After a rigorous screening, if a program seems promising, a site visit may occur. These site visits reveal operational strengths and flaws otherwise not visible. During a site visit, the target population is assessed, the data is examined, and an evaluation design is selected. At the conclusion of the assessment process, evaluators write a report that recommends whether the program should be evaluated. This assessment guides decisions about which programs are good candidates for an outcome evaluation, as well as helps evaluators develop the research design and estimate the cost. This evaluability assessment approach has worked well for NIJ with State and local agencies achieving a level of success and minimizing evaluation risks. This article offers a description of an evaluability assessment approach utilized by NIJ which can assist program administrators at all levels of government save considerable time and money.
  Main Term(s): Program evaluation
  Index Term(s): Evaluation techniques ; Evaluation criteria ; Evaluative research ; Evaluation costs ; Services effectiveness ; National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
  Type: Issue Overview
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.