skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 215915   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Law Enforcement Response to Domestic Violence Calls for Service, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Meg Townsend ; Dana Hunt ; Sarah Kuck ; Caity Baxter
Date Published: 02/2005
Page Count: 108
  Annotation: This study determined current written practices and procedures of law enforcement agencies across the Nation regarding their responses to domestic-violence calls for service.
Abstract: Findings show that 77 percent of police departments have written procedures for responding to domestic-violence calls for service. Fifty-five percent of the departments have revised their initial policies, with most updating them to reflect changes in State law. Approximately 80 percent of the departments consider domestic relationships to include spouses, cohabitants, and parents of a common child. Departments were more likely to specify basic procedures on dispatching, questions to ask, and to prioritizing calls than to state procedures for interacting with victims. Most departments included procedures for arrests, handling violations of protection orders, and conducting on-scene investigations. There was some variation in what was required of call-takers in responding to emergency domestic-violence calls. Departments required officers to engage in a range of activities when dealing with victims and child witnesses of domestic violence. Also, most departments had procedures to increase officer accountability in responding to domestic-violence calls. More departments require officers to receive specialized domestic-violence training than require training for call-takers and dispatchers. Few departments had established domestic violence special units. Although many departments had partnerships with victim advocacy groups, few had advocates working within the department. Larger agencies were more likely to have a domestic-violence policy. The few agencies that included domestic-violence information on their Web sites emphasized services for victims and victim safety. This report identifies policy areas that require further consideration. These findings are based on a survey of a nationally representative sample of just over 14,000 law enforcement agencies nationwide, supplemented with findings from 9 interviews with community-based domestic-violence victim advocacy groups and focus studies with 3 law enforcement agencies. Extensive tabular data and appended survey questionnaire
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Police agencies ; Police management ; Domestic assault ; Police domestic violence training ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 99-C-008
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Type: Survey
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.