skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 219383   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Final Report on the Evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration Volume 2: Findings and Lessons on Implementation
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Adele Harrell ; Lisa Newmark ; Christy Visher
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 06/2007
Page Count: 155
  Annotation: This federally supported report presents the process evaluation of the three Judicial Oversight Demonstration (JOD) sites (Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and Michigan) a model of coordinated justice and community response to intimate partner violence, detailed descriptions of JOD operations in each partner agency within each site, and findings and lessons learned on the implementation of JOD.
Abstract: The process evaluation of the Judicial Oversight Demonstration (JOD) initiative describes the broad changes in the demonstration sites as they implement a model of coordinated justice and community response to intimate partner violence (IPV). All of the sites experienced challenges to the implementation of JOD, yet devised creative solutions to most problems. In addition, the dedication of the site teams to the goals of the demonstration enabled the sites to develop new strategies to facilitate change in their community’s response to IPV. The process evaluation identified a number of strategies used by JOD to accomplish the goals of the project, critical strategies identified include: (1) a formal strategic planning process; (2) active management of the collaboration with regularly scheduled meetings with a full-time director; (3) an inclusive set of partners; (4) training and technical assistance by outsiders with acknowledged expertise to help promote change; and (5) dedicate specialized staff to IPV cases. In addition, the impact of JOD on system response to IPV include: (1) fundamental change in the coordination between the judiciary and other justice and community agencies in IPV cases; (2) increased consistency in the justice system response to IPV cases; and (3) JOD produced changes in the response to IPV that will outlast the demonstration period. This report presents Volume 2 of the evaluation of the JOD initiative and entails the process evaluation, the JOD operations description and the findings and lessons learned on the implementation of JOD. The three demonstration sites included Dorchester, MA, Milwaukee, WI, and Washtenaw County, MI. The JOD initiative tested the idea that a coordinated community response, a focused judicial response, and a systematic criminal justice response could improve victim safety and service provision, as well as offender accountability in IPV cases. Tables and figures
Main Term(s): Domestic assault prevention
Index Term(s): Program evaluation ; Public safety coordination ; Prosecution ; Victim services ; Program implementation ; Intervention ; Domestic assault ; Judicial system development ; Risk management ; Victim program evaluation
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 1999-WT-BX-K005
Sale Source: The Urban Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: For additional information see NCJ-219382, 384-386.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.