skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 223283   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Politics of Criminal Law Reform: A Comparative Analysis of Lower Court Decision-Making
Author(s): Lydia Brashear Tiede
Date Published: 2008
Page Count: 258
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-IJ-CX-0015
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This dissertation analyzes select instances of criminal law reform in the United States, England and Wales, and Chile to ascertain how lower courts make decisions when constrained by higher lawmaking and interpreting bodies.
Abstract: As shown in this dissertation, legislatures acting as principals feel compelled to continually offer solutions to alleviate what are considered high crime rates and sometimes inappropriate punishments by legislating constantly on this topic. Much of the legislation involves constraining lower court judges as agents who are deemed to be responsible for the failures of the criminal justice system. However, the rate and complexity of legislation is not only at cross purposes, but threatens to undermine a pillar of the rule of law, namely predictable, easily ascertainable law. While politicians feel compelled to act when crime rates rise, when a horrendous crime occurs in a constituent’s community, or when prison populations threaten to break the budget, it may be more appropriate to stop and analyze the effects of law and policy on judges and the cases they decide. Criminal law reform is a manifestation of the constant battle waged between politicians who want to appear tough on crime and judges who want to act independently to apply their expertise and judgment in adjudicating criminal cases. This dissertation supported by the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice includes an analysis of sentencing reform in the United States Federal system and England and Wales, as well as an analysis of more general criminal law reform in Chile which converted its criminal process from one that was predominantly inquisitorial to one that is more adversarial in nature. By focusing on the effect of select instances of criminal law reform on lower court decisionmaking, the dissertation includes an analysis of whether lower courts are responsive to legislation and higher court mandates and whether the intent behind criminal law reforms was achieved or whether the reform resulted in unintended consequences. Tables, figures and appendix
Main Term(s): Law reform
Index Term(s): Judges ; Judicial discretion ; Judicial decisions ; Political influences ; Court reform ; Judicial decision compliance ; Sentencing reform ; Judicial attitudes ; Legislative impact ; Legislative issues ; NIJ grant-related documents
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=245199

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.