skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 231177     Find in a Library
Title: Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes, Executive Summary
  Document URL: PDF 
  Dataset URL: DATASET 1
Author(s): Michael R. Smith, J.D., Ph.D. ; Robert J. Kaminski, Ph.D. ; Geoffrey P. Alpert, Ph.D. ; Lorie A. Fridell, Ph.D. ; John MacDonald, Ph.D. ; Bruce Kubu
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 18
  Annotation: This document presents the major findings from a study on the outcomes of police use of force.
Abstract: Findings from this study indicate that 45 percent of State and local law enforcement agencies allow for use of OC spray to overcome passive resistance while 20-30 percent allow for use of conducted electrical devices (CEDs) under these circumstances. The study also found that these devices were similarly effective at reducing the probability of injury for both the suspect and the officer, especially when passive resistance encounters escalated in degree of resistance. In addition, the findings showed that CEDs were used four to five times more often than OC spray among agencies that provided CEDs to their officers. Data for this study were obtained through several methods: 1) a survey of over 500 State and local law enforcement agencies provided an overview of how less lethal force technologies, training, and policies are being used; 2) use of force datasets from Seattle, WA, Miami-Dade, FL, and Richland County, SC, were analyzed to identify individual and situational predictors of injuries to officers and citizens during these events; 3) over 24,000 use of force records from 12 police agencies were analyzed to investigate the relationship between situational and policy-related factors and the likelihood of injury to police and citizens, 4) a longitudinal analysis explored the effect on injury rates of the adoption of the Taser by police departments in Austin, TX, and Orlando, FL; and 5) in-depth interviews with over 250 officers and 25 citizens involved in use of force events in 2 mid-size law enforcement agencies, one of which issued the Taser to its officers and one of which did not. Recommendations for increasing the safe use of OC spray and CEDs are provided. References
Main Term(s): Police use of deadly force
Index Term(s): Less Lethal/ Nonlethal Weapons ; Lawful use of force ; Police weapons use ; National Institute of Justice (NIJ) ; Arrest procedures ; Armed vs unarmed police ; Tasers ; Oleoresin Capsicum (OC)/Pepper Spray ; NIJ grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2005-IJ-CX-0056
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Summary)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.