skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 231663     Find in a Library
  Title: Avoiding Failures of Implementation: Lessons From Process Evaluations
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Amanda B. Cissner ; Donald J. Farole Jr.
  Corporate Author: Center for Court Innovation
United States of America
  Date Published: 06/2009
  Page Count: 16
  Annotation: This paper, which is part of a multifaceted inquiry into failed criminal justice experiments, examines failures that have been caused by improper execution and omissions related to planning and implementation, rather than the design of the program or change undertaken.
  Abstract: Most of the programs whose process evaluations were examined for this paper are experiments in “problem-solving justice,” which are court-based efforts to address the underlying problems of defendants, victims, and communities. The Center of Court Innovation not only conducted the process evaluations, but was involved in planning many of the projects discussed in this paper. Thus, this paper is also the center’s self-reflection about mistakes made in the center’s efforts at change and innovation. The format for presenting the “lessons learned” is to group the lessons under categories and then state and explain each lesson. The lessons under the category, “Engaging in Comprehensive Planning,” are to have a shared vision and identify program goals; identify quantifiable objectives; plan to collect data; and formalize the program model. Under the category of “Identifying Key Stakeholders,” the lessons are to be strategic about when and how to engage stakeholders in the planning process; and think about how to facilitate buy-in from line staff. Lessons for “Responding to Emerging Challenges” are to be realistic; beware of the temptation to overestimate caseload volume; and adapt the program in response to early implementation experience. Under the category of “Recognizing the Need for Leadership,” the lessons are to designate a project director and find political champions. Appended brief descriptions of the programs evaluated
  Main Term(s): Court reform
  Index Term(s): Program implementation ; Court management ; Change management ; Court procedures ; Court management training ; BJA grant-related documents
  Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2007-DD-BX-K050
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Center for Court Innovation
520 Eighth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation ; Report (Technical Assistance)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.