skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 232621     Find in a Library
  Title: Five Year Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of a Community-Based Multi-Agency Intensive Supervision Juvenile Probation Program
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Karen Hennigan ; Kathy Kolnick ; Tian Siva Tian ; Cheryl Maxson ; John Poplawski
  Date Published: 2010
  Page Count: 49
  Annotation: This report presents the findings and methodology of an evaluation to determine the long-term outcomes of an intensive supervision juvenile probation program implemented in several neighborhood after-school centers in high-crime neighborhoods in Los Angeles County.
  Abstract: Over the short term, official records indicated that the new program, called the Youth Family Accountability Model (YFAM), had a positive impact on the youth who were assessed at high risk for future offending at intake. Fewer of the high-risk YFAM youth were rearrested during the program year than their randomly equivalent counterparts who received supervision-as-usual. This result remained stable over the 12 months following the program. Despite these differences in recidivism, however, no differences were found in the percentage of YFAM youth or control youth who remained in the community (as opposed to placement in a probation camp or other facility) at the end of the program. This finding may be due to the increased number of technical probation violation filings and juvenile hall detention commitments received by the YFAM youth during their year in the intensive supervision program. The long-term evaluation (5 years after program completion) failed to produce any favorable findings for the YFAM program participants compared to the control youth. The evaluators recommend that in intensive supervision programs that are likely to detect more probationer technical violations, only the most serious violations should be handled in a court process, so as to prevent deeper involvement with the criminal justice system. In addition, younger, lower risk youth should not be under intensive supervision with higher risk youth. For the evaluation, 1,817 juvenile offenders in 12 catchment areas were randomly assigned to the YFAM program or to the supervision-as-usual control group. Outcomes were measured during and 1 year after program completion and then 5 years after program completion. 13 tables and 57 references
  Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
  Index Term(s): Longitudinal studies ; Juvenile probation effectiveness ; Intensive juvenile probation ; OJJDP final report ; California
  Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
US Dept of Justice
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2007-JF-FX-0066
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse/NCJRS
P.O. Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Evaluation
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.