skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 233986     Find in a Library
  Title: State of the Science of Pretrial Risk Assessment
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Cynthia A. Mamalian, Ph.D.
  Corporate Author: Pretrial Justice Institute
United States of America
  Date Published: 03/2011
  Page Count: 42
  Annotation: This report summarizes the key points derived from a meeting of researchers and practitioners who met to discuss the current state of the science and practice of pretrial justice.
  Abstract: The meeting addressed “significant next steps” in advancing the administration of pretrial justice, how to ensure efficient and effective release/detention decisions for pretrial defendants, the management of defendant risk through appropriate and specific conditions of release, and ways of balancing the rights of defendants with community safety. The report’s first section presents a brief review of the history and current state of pretrial justice. The second section identifies and discusses critical issues in pretrial release, detention, and risk assessment. The third section considers challenges in implementing evidence-based risk assessment and threats to reliable administration; the latter include time constraints, the practicality of using a risk-assessment instrument, money bail schedules, local capacity, subjective risk assessment, court culture, and judicial behavior. The report’s fourth section addresses methodological challenges related to the prediction of risk. The concluding section outlines the goals of the pretrial period and offers recommendations for research and practice. The goals of pretrial justice are to improve adherence to constitutional, statutory, and case law; increase the number of individuals objectively and thoroughly assessed; to reduce unnecessary pretrial detention while maintaining public safety and the integrity of the judicial process; and to save money through the more effective use of jail beds. Objective assessment should ensure that low-risk defendants are released on their own recognizance, that moderate-risk defendants are released with nonfinancial conditions and are appropriately managed in the community by trained and resourced supervision staff, and that defendants objectively assessed as being a danger to the community are detained after a due process hearing. Recommendations for research and practice suggest future directions. 3 notes
  Main Term(s): Court procedures
  Index Term(s): Pretrial procedures ; Pretrial release ; Pretrial hearings ; Criminality prediction ; Pretrial detention
  Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2009-DB-BX-K021
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America

Pretrial Justice Institute
1101 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004
United States of America
  Type: Issue Overview
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.