skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 234803     Find in a Library
  Title: Principles of Problem-Solving Justice
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Robert V. Wolf
  Corporate Author: Center for Court Innovation
United States of America
  Date Published: 2007
  Page Count: 16
  Annotation: This paper identifies and discusses the principles shared by domestic-violence, drug, and other problem-solving courts.
  Abstract: The six principles discussed are based on the Center for Court Innovation’s experience in developing problem-solving initiatives in New York. One principle is better staff training in the particular issues and offenses with which the court deals (e.g., domestic violence or drug addiction), combined with better information on litigants, victims, and the community context of crime. Such improved knowledge can enhance the decisionmaking of judges, attorneys, and other justice officials regarding treatment needs and the risks individual defendants pose to public safety. A second principle pertains to community engagement. In developing a specialized approach to particular types of offenders and offenses, citizens and neighborhood groups have an important role to play in helping the justice system identify, prioritize, and solve local problems. A third principle is collaboration. Justice system leaders are uniquely positioned to engage a diverse range of people, government agencies, and community organizations in collaborative efforts to improve public safety. This can have the effect of expanding innovative responses to problems through innovative diversion and sentencing options. A fourth principle involves individualized justice. Using valid, evidence-based risk and needs assessment instruments, the justice system can solve problems by linking offenders to community-based services tailored to the needs and risks of the individual offender. A fifth principle concerns accountability. By insisting on regular and rigorous compliance monitoring and consequences for noncompliance, the justice system can improve offenders’ accountability for their behaviors. The sixth principle pertains to a focus on outcomes for the problem-solving process. Through the ongoing collection and analysis of data, outcomes (costs and benefits) can be measured in determining the effectiveness of operations and setting directions for continuous improvement in the justice system’s operation.
  Main Term(s): Alternative court procedures
  Index Term(s): Treatment offender matching ; Court personnel ; Court personnel educational programs ; Team diagnosis ; Court procedures ; Court personnel orientation ; BJA grant-related documents
  Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2005-PP-CX-K008
  Sale Source: Center for Court Innovation
520 Eighth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States of America
  Type: Issue Overview
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.