skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 236868   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Intimate Partner Abuse in Divorce Mediation: Outcomes from a Long-Term Multi-Cultural Study
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Connie J.A. Beck Ph.D. ; Michele E. Walsh Ph.D. ; Mindy B. Mechanic Ph.D. ; Aurelio Jose Figueredo Ph.D. ; Mei-Kuang Chen, M.A., M.S.
  Date Published: 2011
  Page Count: 238
  Annotation: Using several archival court and law enforcement databases, this study documented the prevalence of intimate partner abuse (IPA) among 965 couples involved in the divorce process in one court-mandated mediation program in one jurisdiction; analyzed mediator practices in addressing IPA cases; and assessed mediation, divorce, and post-decree outcomes for IPA cases.
  Abstract: Based on self-reports, just over 90 percent of the cases involved some type of IPA, including threats of or actual physical violence, sexual intimidation, coercion, or assault. Two-thirds of the couples reported IPA incidents in which one or both partners sought services from police, shelters, courts, or hospitals. Only 6 percent of the cases were screened out of mediation because of IPA, and special procedural accommodations were often provided in cases where a parent requested the mediation service to do so because of alleged IPA. Although mediation agreements rarely included restrictions on contact between parents or on parenting, the victims of severe IPA often left mediation without agreements and returned to court in order to obtain restrictions on contact with the other partner and/or restrictions on aspects of parenting. Couples who reached a mediation agreement were less likely to re-litigate in court, which provides support for mediation programs. The study first linked data from clinical interviews used to screen parents for marital stressors and IPA to questionnaire data that also measured specific IPA-related behaviors. The study then linked this IPA data to the mediator’s decision concerning whether to identify a case as involving IPA, whether to proceed in mediation, or to screen out IPA-identified cases, as well as whether to provide special procedural accommodations for such cases. The study then linked the IPA and mediator decisions to mediation outcomes and to outcomes in final divorce decrees and parenting plans recorded in Superior Court divorce files. 16 figures, 16 tables, extensive references, and appended supplementary information and study instruments
  Main Term(s): Victims of violence
  Index Term(s): Domestic relations ; Child custody ; Domestic assault ; Divorce mediation ; NIJ final report
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2007-WG-BX-0028
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Report (Study/Research)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.