skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 238483     Find in a Library
Title: Solving Sexual Assaults: Finding Answers Through Research
Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:270  Dated:June 2012  Pages:4 to 17
Series: NIJ Journal
Author(s): Nancy Ritter
Date Published: 06/2012
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Document: HTML PDF 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: For a sample of nearly 11,000 untested sexual assault kits (SAKs) in the property rooms of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department (LASD), this study assessed the efficacy of DNA testing and determined the criminal justice outcomes (arrest, charge, conviction) within the first 6 months after the kits were DNA tested.
Abstract: Regarding the study’s second objective, for a randomly selected sample of 371 SAKs, there were no new arrests; new charges were filed in 1 case; and there were 2 convictions in the first 6 months after these kits were tested. Researchers concluded that it is probable that the DNA testing was not responsible for the single filing and the two convictions. The study also held focus groups with sexual assault investigators, prosecuting attorneys, and criminalists from the LAPD and LASD. These groups considered the role SAK evidence plays in resolving stranger and non-stranger sexual assaults. Participants’ most commonly expressed sentiment was that mandatory testing of SAKs was unnecessary when the suspect’s identity is already known, such that the main legal issue is whether there was consent from the alleged victim. Based on study findings, the researchers recommend that criteria be developed for submitting SAKs to the lab and criteria for deciding which kits should be DNA tested. A second recommendation is that mandatory data elements be established for recordkeeping, including why a decision was made not to send a SAK to the crime lab for testing. A third recommendation is that jurisdictions not start testing all SAKs in their custody until they know whether the kit has been previously tested and whether the case has been adjudicated without being DNA tested. Related NIJ action-research projects are briefly described for Houston, Detroit, and the State of Massachusetts. 1 figure and 7 notes
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Evidence collection ; Police management ; Police decisionmaking ; Rape investigations ; Investigative techniques ; Sex offense investigations ; Rape investigation training ; Rape evidence kits ; DNA fingerprinting ; NIJ grant-related documents ; California
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=260528

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.