skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 240697     Find in a Library
  Title: Ballistic Body Armor: A Closer Look at the Follow-Up Inspection and Testing Program
  Document URL: HTML PDF 
  Author(s): Michele R. Coppola
  Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:271  Dated:February 2013  Pages:14 to 17
  Date Published: 02/2013
  Page Count: 4
  Annotation: This article discusses the follow-up inspection and testing program for use in ensuring that recently manufactured body armor meets the standards established by the National Institute of Justice.
  Abstract: In July 2008, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) published its most recent set of standards for body armor: Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor, NIJ Standard-0101.06. These standards establish minimum performance requirements and test methods for determining the ballistic resistance of body armor designed to protect the torso against gunfire. This article discusses the NIJ Compliance Testing Program (CTP), a program in which manufacturers voluntarily submit equipment samples for testing by NIJ-approved laboratories to determine whether their particular model or models comply with a particular NIJ standard. The CTP contains two phases: phase 1 involves documenting the design of a particular model and testing 28 samples to verify that it meets the minimum standards; phase 2 involves subjecting new samples to additional ballistic testing and comparing the findings to those from phase 1, ensuring consistent production of the body armor. The article also discusses the results of follow-up inspections that were conducted between September 2010 and August 2012. To date, these follow-up inspections have found eight body armor models that have had major variations in construction that could affect ballistic performance. Proposed changes to the program are discussed.
  Main Term(s): Body armor/Personal protective equipment
  Index Term(s): Protective shields ; Ballistics ; Standards ; Protective equipment ; Criminal justice standards
  Type: Best Practice/State-of-the-Art Review
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.