skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 240757   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Assessment of the Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative: Final Project Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Edmund F. McGarrell ; Nicholas Corsaro ; Chris Melde ; Natalie Hipple ; Jennifer Cobbina ; Timothy Bynum ; Heather Perez
Date Published: 07/2012
Page Count: 197
  Annotation: This report presents the methods and outcomes for the evaluation of the U.S. Justice Department’s Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI), whose goal is to support local communities in preventing and controlling gang crime.
Abstract: The cities involved in the evaluation were Cleveland, Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Tampa, Indianapolis, Oklahoma City, Rochester, Raleigh/Durham, Chicago, Detroit, and a seven-city region in eastern Pennsylvania. Regarding outcomes, CAGI cities had a larger decline in violent crime than the comparison cities that did not implement CAGI; however, the difference was not statistically significant. When level of implementation of enforcement was included, the high-enforcement CAGI cities experienced a 15-percent decline in violent crime, which was statistically significant. For the CAGI cities, higher levels of Federal prosecution for gun crime were negatively related to violent crime. Several key findings emerged from an analysis of CAGI implementation procedures. There was a consensus across the sties that CAGI had stimulated the development of a variety of new partnerships, mostly among criminal justice agencies. The most common enforcement strategies were increased Federal prosecution, increased State and local prosecution, joint case prosecution screening, and directed police patrols. The most common gang prevention strategies were education and outreach, school-based prevention, ex-offender outreach, and substance abuse treatment. The implementation of reentry interventions was the most challenging intervention, as most sites had difficulty in meeting target client numbers. At a minimum, greater attention must be given to effective implementation. Local CAGI officials recognized these challenges, and they recommended a planning period that would allow time for the establishment of effective partnerships before fully funding programs like CAGI. Also, greater attention should be given to developing reliable measures of gang crime at the local level. Federal funding agencies might make gang-crime data availability a prerequisite for receiving Federal funding for anti-gang programs. 28 tables, 14 figures 98 references, and appended evaluation instruments
Main Term(s): Gangs
Index Term(s): Police effectiveness ; Program implementation ; Effectiveness of crime prevention programs ; Violence prevention ; Gang Prevention ; Gang violence ; NIJ final report ; NIJ grant-related documents ; Florida ; Illinois ; Indiana ; Michigan ; New York ; North Carolina ; Ohio ; Oklahoma ; Pennsylvania ; Texas ; Wisconsin ; California
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2007-IJ-CX-0035
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.