skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 241925     Find in a Library
  Title: Partners in Research: Lessons Learned in Los Angeles
  Document URL: HTML PDF 
  Author(s): Bethany Backes ; Melissa Rorie
  Journal: National Institute of Justice Journal  Issue:272  Dated:September 2013  Pages:47 to 52
  Date Published: 09/2013
  Page Count: 6
  Series: NIJ Journal
  Annotation: This report reviews lessons learned from a partnership of academic researchers and criminal justice practitioners in Los Angles that focused on the processing and prosecutorial outcomes of sexual assault cases.
  Abstract: The research focused on case attrition, unfounded cases (those cases that investigations determined to be false or baseless), and cases cleared by exceptional means. At the conclusion of the study the researchers and practitioners were surveyed about their experiences in the partnership. They agreed that although working together was not always easy, it was helpful in obtaining information on sexual assault reporting, investigation, and case processing. The format of this presentation of the lessons learned presents the questions asked researchers and practitioners by the NIJ interviewer about their experiences in the partnership. One of the questions was “What is the most important thing you learned from the process?” A practitioner responded that the study reinforced the value of independent research and critical reviews of the department’s practices. The researcher responding to this question indicated that the person who has oversight of such a large and lengthy project requires the knowledge and background needed to deal effectively with issues or concerns during the process. This is important because the process necessarily had many components that must be understood by the overseer in order to avoid premature or faulty conclusions. In addition, the study must be evaluated objectively so as to recognize its strengths and weaknesses, as well as to determine whether the study measures up to established scientific standards of excellence. This respondent also advised that it is important for agencies to know as much as possible about the study, including associated costs, before committing to it. In addition, researchers should have a thorough knowledge of the criminal justice agency or agencies that will be involved.
  Main Term(s): Criminology
  Index Term(s): Prosecution ; Sexual assault ; Case processing ; University/Criminal Justice Agency Collaboration ; NIJ grant-related documents ; California
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 2009-WG-BX-0009
  Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
  Type: Program/Project Description ; Program/Project Evaluation ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.