skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 242191     Find in a Library
Title: Prosecuting Elder Abuse Cases: Proposed Performance Measures
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Brenda K. Uekert, Ph.D. ; Susan Keilitz, J.D. ; Page Ulrey, J.D. ; Candace Heisler, J.D. ; Erin G. Baldwin, J.D.
Corporate Author: National Ctr for State Courts
United States of America

Center for Elders and the Courts (CEC)
United States of America
Date Published: 2012
Page Count: 58
  Annotation: As a means of increasing effectiveness in prosecuting elder-abuse cases, this guide presents an overview of performance measures and recommends strategies for “flagging” such cases; and it proposes logistics and tools required to collect, analyze, and interpret each performance measure.
Abstract: The purposes of the performance measures are to plan and meet established operating goals/standards for intended outcomes; to detect deviations from planned levels of performance; and to restore performance to the initial or meet new performance levels. Before proposing the performance measures, this guide addresses typical reasons a prosecutor’s office may resist developing performance measures for the prosecution of elder-abuse cases. The eight recommended performance measures together address case preparation, case processing, victim outcomes, and offender sanctions. The eight performance measures pertain to the use of an evidence checklist, the use of expert consultants, the time to case resolution, prosecution-initiated continuances, victim satisfaction ratings, early payment of restitution, supervised sentences, and contact restrictions. Following the descriptions of performance measures, the guide turns to the issue of “flagging” cases, which consists of working with law enforcement in setting the criteria and establishing a data system that will assist in identifying those cases to which the performance measures will apply. The guide concludes with a major section on the logistics for determining whether or not performance measures are being met. Topics discussed include the data-collection process, required data elements, and the case file summary form. The specific logistics for determining whether or not each performance measure is being met are discussed. A listing of additional national organizations and resources
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): Prosecution ; Prosecutorial screening ; Elder Abuse ; Prosecutor training ; Elderly victims ; BJA grant-related documents ; Performance Measures
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-DB-BX-K024
Sale Source: National Ctr for State Courts
300 Newport Avenue
Williamsburg, VA 23185-4147
United States of America
Type: Instructional Material ; Report (Technical Assistance) ; Report (Grant Sponsored)
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: For another publication in this series, see NCJ-242190.
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.