skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 242812   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Collecting DNA at Arrest: Policies, Practices, and Implications, Final Technical Report
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Julie E. Samuels ; Elizabeth H. Davies ; Dwight B. Pope
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: 07/2013
Page Count: 126
  Annotation: In order to assess the effects and implications of expanding DNA collection to include arrestees, this study examined the provisions of existing arrestee DNA laws, how the courts have interpreted these laws, and how they have been implemented by State laboratories and collecting agencies; it also addressed how this practice has affected the growth of DNA databases, the number of “hits” to forensic profiles, and the frequency with which DNA aids investigations.
Abstract: The study’s analysis of State-provided data indicates that arrestee DNA law have contributed to additional DNA profiles in CODIS and additional hits; however, the study could not estimate the number of hits for which arrestee DNA laws were solely responsible. The study also determined that the implementation of arrestee laws has imposed significant administrative and analytical burdens on many State laboratories and collecting agencies. The ability to expunge arrestee data for arrestees acquitted or otherwise had their cases dismissed is cited as an important safeguard; however, expungements are rare when arrestees must initiate the process and are otherwise administratively problematic. The researchers advise that States that do not currently have arrestee DNA law may wish to consider the potential benefits of expanded collection in terms of a real but limited number of additional hits and subsequent cases resolved, given the administrative burdens and costs required in collecting from defendants before convictions, as well as the legal uncertainty surrounding the arrestee DNA laws themselves. Even if the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately upholds such laws, questions will remain about their cost-effectiveness. The design of new laws should recognize the tradeoffs that may occur during implementation. Data sources and data collection are described. 23 figures, 9 tables, and appendixes with references, case summaries, legal matrix laboratory representative interview protocol, Interview coding scheme, sample data request, stakeholder interview protocols, and annual CODIS/NDIS data
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Suspect identification ; State laws ; Arrest procedures ; DNA fingerprinting ; NIJ final report
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2009-DN-BX-0004
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Report (Grant Sponsored) ; Legislation/Policy Analysis
Country: United States of America
Language: English
Note: See NCJ-242813 for the Executive Summary
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.